Philosophers for Enlightenment in the sense of Immanuel Kant
A brief overview of history and legitimate doubts about historiography, skepticism is known to all philosophers
[ ]

Please reduce the website view until you see a black bar with text on the left

A woman's name says nothing about her beauty and intelligence. Men feel the same way.
And my website with the name feels the same way.

The German counterpart is called:

If you like the website, please recommend it to your friends. Of course, the website can be expanded at any time to include current topics.

There are truth philosoper pro conspiracy.

Freedom of expression without punishment and the resulting diversity of opinion is a great asset of a democratic society and must be fought for anew every day.

Reading is culture !!!

Conspiracy theories are all crazy or parallel historiography ???
Decide for yourself !!!

A critical examination and writing of history is only love for the truth, or seeker for the truth.

Most of us Christians have heard the story of Santa Claus from our parents. This was the first conspiracy theory that we were all able to experience up close. This conspiracy theory is also a conspiracy fact in which our parents explained to us that if you are nice, Santa Claus comes with gifts; If you are evil, Then Santa Claus comes with the rod, without presents. The topic of christian persecution is very well documented on Wikipedia, even if most people have not heard of it on television. According to Wikipedia, Christians are the most persecuted and fought species.
On the subject of World War II, there is only so much for the time being, there are many films on the subject unfortunately only on German.Some Americans themselves have German ancestors who are accused of crimes. But is all this true?
Are you religious?
Then Darwin's teachings would have to be considered a conspiracy theory. Darwin's theory of species ancestry is officially just a theory. The same applies to the Big Bang theory. The emphasis is on theory.
If you used to want to get good grades in school, then you told everything the teachers told you. They were trained like tigers and elephants in the circus. There are some people who doubt the so-called moon landing in 1969. They claim that this film was shot in the television studio because both the lander's technology was immature and, in their opinion, could not be transmitted - from the moon to Earth in 1969.
Some people in the U.S. are still experiencing dead spots in the 21st century. How, then, could you send through the Van Allen radiation belt in 1969? Why is everyone silent? Well, quite simply, their employer NASA pays employees with acceptable salaries, plus paid leave, etc. In addition, not all are inaugurated, but only those who absolutely need to be initiated. Do the pseudoscientists explore things that cannot be realized?
Yes, of course, if you get paid for it. People can try to explore many things and not achieve some things. People can't allow cars to drive through walls without destroying walls and/or cars, but that's what you could do. If you pay the workers well for this, they will go to work tomorrow. We all know documentaries from television that explain the origin of the earth according to the teachings of the atheistic sciences.
Do you really think that's why a camera was hanging somewhere in space when Earth came into being? No? All documentaries only colorful pictures without evidential value? Such video documentaries are also available for the intended trip to Mars.Did you also learn in school that the word "Niger" is a swear word or did you read it in the children's book "Uncle Tom's Hut" by Harriet Beecher-Stowe? If you spoke perfect Latin, you would know that this is a lie. The Google Translater says that the Latin word "Niger," which has been translated into English, means "black" or "dark," and that's what America's blacks claim about themselves, right?

Under the following 13 videos you will find the parallel historiography of the Second World War

Aerosol Crimes  (aka Chemtrail Crimes) - (Length 100 minutes)

Chemtrails - What in the world are they spraying ( approximately 100 minutes )

Herman Rosenblatt bei TV abc-Interview (Legth: short)

Jews over Concentrationcamps


10 Newspaper from 1915 to 1939 with holocaust and 6 Milion ( Length: 20 minutes )

The first Holocaust  from Don Heddesheimer ( Length: 70 minutes )


BBC speak over christian persecution

christian persecution

christian persecutuin

UN corruptionMuslims Only-No refuge for Christians sister Hatune explains

Next Thema 2nd World War

The first declaration of war against the German Reich came on March, 24 1933 by newspaper.

Please also read the text under the heading. (Please right-click on the image and select Open in new tab). The text under the headline puts the headline into perspective. A call for an economic boycott is, of course, not a war.  A week later, Hitler called on the German people not to buy from Jews.

Statute for the International Military Tribunal in Germany, which was confiscated according to US interpretation and S. H. A. E. F. laws of America.

The military tribunal took place in a state without a German government in no man's land, which was occupied by the four Allied states.

Article 6c
c) Crimes against humanity: namely: murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation or other inhuman acts (etc.)
In the enumeration of various crimes, it is striking that extermination apparently has nothing to do with murder, but most likely has to do with expulsion.

Article 19
The Court is not bound by rules of evidence, it should apply to a large extent a rapid and non-formal procedure, and allow any evidence that it considers to have probative value.

Article 21
The Court should not seek evidence of generally known facts, but should take note of them of its own motion; (etc.)
Comment: "The earth is a flat disk", a well-known fact, was believed for a long time.

Or false exaggerated concentration camps Auschwitz and Majdanek - number of victims, plus false statement about the Katyn massacre.
In Article 19 of the London Statute, the Allied States admit that they do not want to be bound by rules of evidence and therefore have not proven anything according to valid law which otherwise applies to civil court proceedings.
The number of 4 million Auschwitz victims is now officially considered a lie, even if it was presented like a prayer wheel from 1945 to the 1990s.
Unfortunately, Jews also participated in the false statements.

The Final Solution of the Jewish Question

The so-called extermination order.
The word eradicate comes logically in the book "Mein Kampf" by Adolf Hitler.
Mr. Hitler claims that the Jews want to eradicate the intelligentsia.
(I don't think Hitler thinks the Jews want to kill all intelligent people.)
Furthermore, the book states that Germanism was exterminated in the Habsburg monarchy.
(I have never heard of German people killed in the Habsburg Monarchy.)

exterminate, rot, Rottenführer, rot, the Rotte = today unfortunately often an outdated way of expression.
However, in GDR times, the newspapers of the GDR still had the word rotting together.
In GDR times, for example, there were illegal gatherings of "civil rights activists", i.e. they met for an unauthorized demonstration.
The Rottenführer does not lead his Rotte to his death, but from A to B.
The fallen tree, which lies in the forest and rots in front of it, decays into humus by itself.
Extermination also means according to the documents of the SS, which were written in the house of the Wannsee Conference
emigrate, evacuate (meaning: resettlement).
The word "extermination camp" is often translated as extermination camp or extermination camp.
The word extermination camp is a malicious insinuation.

If the Auschwitz concentration camp had been an extermination camp, the total number of victims would have been much higher and there would not have been Auschwitz survivors of all ages in Israel or in the USA in 1948.
A military court which, according to Article 19, was not bound by general rules of evidence can hardly be described as fair, but judgments should be passed quickly.
In the USA, there have often been miscarriages of justice even in execution trials, where person A was killed and years later it turned out by chance that the real perpetrator D only came into the hands of the investigating authorities years later.

Allied War Criminal Trials

The Allied states held court hearings in Germany after the 2nd World War to the main culprits of the war and the mass killings of the Jews in the To condemn and punish concentration camps( concentration camps).
The first and best-known post-war trial was the so-called IMT, i.e. the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg. Furthermore, there was the I.G. Farben process.
At the I.G. Farben trial, according to the official historiography, among other things, the people who produced the "Cyklon-B".  In the court files of the I.G. Farben trial, in principle the word "Zyklon-B" or "Cyclone-B" is not included.
The word "Zyklon-B" is only 2 times in the footnotes, where the Americans explain why they lead this process. In the continuous text only the words lostgas, mustardgas and poisongas come before.

Lostgas (Loste) = sulphur and nitrogenous compounds
Mustardgas = mustard gas
Poisongas = combat gas


you can easily download in those PDF files according to keywords, such as "Zyklon-B" or Search "cyclone-B".
The International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg

On the website   you find 40.000 pages from the IG Farbentrial as pictueres, you can not search with adobe reader. 

At the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg, the main war criminals were convicted.
However, there was a peculiarity, the accusations of guilt of the Allies did not have to be proven.

1. When, for example.B the communist Soviets claimed in court that 4 million people died in the Auschwitz concentration camp. then they did not have to prove this somehow objectively. This Soviet claim is in volume 39 of the IMT files.

Today, 70 years later and after the end of the "Cold War", the official number of Auschwitz victims is, according to the Polish Auschwitz Museum with 1 to 1.5 million dead and you can also borrow books about the Auschwitz concentration camp in Germany in which the total number of victims is given as a maximum of 711,000 ( by Jean Claude Pressac - "The crematoria of Auschwitz - Technique of Mass Murder" ) - can be found in good libraries.

2. Before the IMT in Nuremberg, Vol. 01 on page 47 that in the Maijdanek concentration camp 1.5 million people including Jews were killed.

Wikipedia today gives the total number of victims at 80,000 including 60,000 Jews. Number of victims increased by a factor of 19.

picture from wikipedia

3. The Communist Soviets also made the statement before the same court that the National Socialists had about 8,000 Polish officers were shot dead in Katyn (Poland).

As early as the 1950s, the Americans, in collaboration with the International Red Cross, determined that this not the National Socialists, but Stalin's NKVD were the perpetrators, which wikipedia also sees it that way.
( IMT Volumes 39 page 330 are 100 Perjured Testimonies about the Katyn Massacre.
100 witnesses have lied about an overall historically relatively "small incident" of the Second World War. What will that have been like in the case of major events?

4. The "Zyklon-B" accusation also came from the communist Soviet side and does not fit the statements from the I.G. Color Process.

If the communist soviets demonstrably expressed 3 lies (Maijdanek, Auschwitz victim number and Katyn) in court the question must be to be allowed whether the "Zyklon-B" or "Cyclone B" historiography, which does not fit the IG Farben process, is also a lie?
When the Americans, British and French liberated a concentration camp, there was no "Cyklon-B" for killing people and when the Soviets liberated a concentration camp, there was "Cyklon-B."   Is the murder weapon dependent on the liberator?
Shouldn't one expect the SS to have used the same technique for killing in all concentration camp branches?
All statements by Jews about "Cyklon-B" killings are so-called "hearsay" statements.  There are only the Jewish Capos with of the SS, as the only "eyewitnesses" who after the war usually presented their fellow Jews with the Credibility problem.
Thanks to the fact that in the concentration camps both the barracks and the clothes were disinfected by means of "Cyklon-B", the "Red Army" find mountains from these "Cyklon-B" rifles.

At this point, some readers ask, why did the German Reich start the war?

If you are interested in the topic, I can also recommend a book by Udo Walendy with the title: "The Guilt Question of the Second World War" to read. (Please click with the mouse on the title to download the PDF file)
Enclosed with the abstract:

How did the war ???

Short summary, how did the war come about?
The person Adolf Hitler was elected democratically in the period after the Versailles Peace Treaty. The German people felt that the Treaty of Versailles after the First World War was unjust, regardless of whether people thought politically right or left, and many spoke of a treaty of peace.
The Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler, who at that time strove to represent the interests of the German people, did not live in a vacuum, like today's heads of government, but his actions were also dependent on the actions of other heads of government whether Polish, British or French plus Austrian and Czech.

The annexation of Austria

The annexation of Austria became necessary after the Austrian opposition submitted a motion to annex the state of Austria to the German Reich. The people of Austria should be allowed to vote on whether or not Austria will be annexed to the German Reich. The Government of Austria sabotaged the proposal for a referendum on the subject in the same way that Austrians only had the opportunity to vote for Austria's independence on their ballot papers on the subject. A choice was therefore practically non-existent. The Austrian government had not, as the Austrian opposition parties wanted, provided for the possibility of joining the German Reich. When, as a result, some representatives of the Austrian opposition parties asked Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler to help them and the Austrian people against the fraudulent government of Austria, Mr. Hitler remembered that he was born in Austria and helped the Austrian people and annexed Austria.
At that time, when German soldiers entered Austria, there was probably more popular approval than rejection.

The annexation of the Czech Republic to the German Reich

The annexation of the Czech Republic took place at the request of Doctor Hacha, the then Czech president, who at that time observed unrest in neighboring Slovakia and who feared that these unrest could spread to the Czech Republic.
For this reason, the then Czech President Doctor Hacha went with his secretary on the train to Berlin and asked the Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler to protect the Czech Republic militarily from the Slovaks, which then led to the entry of German troops into the Czech Republic.

War against Poland ?

The Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler was forced to act vis-à-vis the Polish state, since the Poles were already firing weapons at German airliners flying from Berlin to Königsberg before September 1, 1939, the Poles closed German schools, trade union offices and churches in which people spoke german. In addition, the Germans were deprived of their right of inheritance if they wanted to bequeath land. According to the will of the Treaty of Versailles, the Germans were unfortunately to live partly in the newly founded state of Poland under a Polish government.
The Poles staged so-called pogroms on German shops and set fire to German farms, and between January 1939 and the end of August 1939 alone, they expelled more than seventy thousand Germans from Polish territories, or the Germans voluntarily fled after the Polish government arbitrarily imprisoned German people.
A small insert from the book "Truth for Germany" by Udo Walendy:

Factually correct and unrefuted by historical research, the German White Paper in 1939 stated:
German protests are unsuccessful (No. 360).
At the beginning of April, a public appeal is circulated throughout Poland containing the General Programme for the De-Germanisation of the Country (No. 358).
In mid-April, the first German refugees cross the border (No. 359).
It is almost impossible for consulates to list all cases individually. (No. 361).
In Upper Silesia, too, agitation rages without measure (No. 362).
Acts of terrorism fill the reports of the German consulates (No. 363).
The (Polish) Insurgent Association issues the terrorist orders (No. 364).
On May 6, Consulate General Katowice reported 200 terrorist cases (No. 365),
on May 19 another hundred (No. 372) from Upper Silesia alone.
No German is safe of his life and property anymore. The terror also spreads to the Congress-Polish territory and is exacerbated by planned arson (No. 366).
The last cultural-political bases of Germanism are destroyed. (No.).
The German ethnic group, in its desperation, turns to the Polish President (No. 369).
The English Government is kept informed by the German Embassy of the development of peace danger (No. 368)
without anything happening. In mid-May, the agitation increases to German pogroms, in which thousands of Germans are hunted "like wild game" (No. 370 + 371).
The refugee movement is increasing (No. 374),
including Polish sabre-rattling, the proclamation of annexationist war aims (No. 367 + 378)
and the public slurs and insults of the Führer, which again force sharp protests (No. 382).
In the economic sector, German cooperatives, dairies and pharmacies are scheduled to be liquidated (No. 380 + 395).

Lodz reports on June 7:
The threats to ethnic Germans with manslaughter, torture, etc. have become daily self-evident. Whole families spend their nights in the woods because of the constant death threats (No. 351).
Protests in the Polish Foreign Ministry are met with a shrug of the shoulders and a tacit admission that one has become powerless in the face of the military and the prisoner of Polish chauvinism (No. 382 + 385).
Polish bishops are asked by a Colonel-General to pray that the "Polish brothers on the other side of the border will be shortened their probationary period and that they will be freed from their lack of freedom by a second Grunwald" (No. 392). It is becoming increasingly clear that the authorities themselves are the bearers of the liquidation process (No. 396).
Germanism in Galicia is on the verge of annihilation. It no longer sees a future and is threatened with arson and danger to life and limb (No. 407).
What open terror overlooks is made up for by tax terror and harassment of the authorities (No. 408)

Independent historians also confirm this fact after the war:
"What happened to Poland in 1939 came as no surprise.
It is clear that already in the twenties thoughtful observers and some statesmen predicted these events.
(End of quote)

The Poles wanted war against Germany since they had a military alliance with France and Great Britain and there are sufficient quotes from Polish officers and members of the government as early as 1936 who speak of Poland's will to war against Germany.
Likewise, even before September 1, 1939, Polish militias were spotted on German territory, setting fire to German farmsteads and shelling the people.
(for more information read the book "Truth for Germany" by Udo Walendy or the book "Poland – War Calculus, Preparation, Execution" by Dr. Stefan Scheill.)

The state of the "German Reich" did not declare war on the Poles. There is no declaration of war by the "German Reich" against Poland. The Germans merely declared that "from 5.45 a.m. onwards, shots will be fired back." If one interprets this generally (symbolically) on the border violations of Poland against the German Reich between January 1939 and August 1939, then this is correctly reproduced.
The Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler unfortunately imagined that he had to represent the interests of his German compatriots who lived and lived under Polish care in New Poland. Thus, The Reich Chancellor Hitler felt compelled to let German troops invade Warsaw. Whether other heads of government and chancellors of foreign states today or in the past would have acted in the same way, I do not know.
After the occupation of Poland, Reich Chancellor Hitler tried to restart peace talks with Great Britain and France. This phase lasted from October 1939 to May 1941 (Rudolf Hess's flight to Great Britain).

The so-called Western Allies would have been happy to agree to the peace efforts, then according to official historiography there would have been no mass gassings of Jews from November 1941.
Unfortunately, the Western Allied states, above all Great Britain, did not agree to Hitler's peace proposals. In this context, we recall the Jewish declaration of war by the British "Daily Express" in March 1933.

The Western Allies preferred to rely on a bomber and bombing war against Germany and thus destroyed the infrastructure in Germany.
The Allies destroyed cities such as Hamburg or the Ruhr area with their incendiary bombs. However, Dresden also experienced this Allied suffering of phosphorus bombing. According to the British, between 350,000 and 500,000 civilians died in Dresden. Refugees from Wroclaw and other eastern territories plus the local population.
Due to the destroyed factories, roads, bridges and railway tracks, the food supply in the concentration camps became worse by the day and so the Allied soldiers were then (after the war) able to show the so-called "world public" pictures from the concentration camps where the people had starved to death thanks to their own Allied war crimes (bombing of civilian residential districts).
Unfortunately, many people today forget that German civilians outside the concentration camps did not fare any better.

What is a world war ???
Surely you know the historiography about the Second World War.Surely you also know when the Second World War began.
However, is their supposedly correct knowledge also true?
No, unfortunately not.
Unfortunately, they memorized a lot of false "knowledge" in history lessons at school because they wanted to get good grades.
The Second World War did not begin on September 1, 1939.
On September 1, only the german Polish War began, and a war between two states is not a world war.
On September 3, 1939 France, Great Britain, Australia, India and New Zealand declared war on the "German Reich", so we had a seven-state war. Is this already a world war?
If you take the definition of "world war" from wikipedia, where does a world war take place, if wars extend over several continents, then the continents of Australia and the continent of Asia, i.e. India, come into the race on September 3, 1939 and they have declared war on the German Reich and not the other way around.
The Union of South Africa declared war on the German Reich on 6 September 1939 and Canada followed on 10 September 1939. Now we had a "Nine States War" including the representatives of the state of Africa and the continent of America in the case of Canada.
From this point of view, Great Britain and its Commenwealth states must have triggered the Second World War, but not the German Reich.
Anyway, if you follow the logic of the 1st World War, where the initial war between Austria-Hungary on the one hand and Serbia on the other broke out on July 28, 1914, and the German Reich since it had a defensive alliance with Austria entered the war only 3 days later, but then after wars were awarded sole blame for this war. got; if one follows this Allied logic, then it should also be clear that France and Great Britain are responsible for the 2nd World War.
(France and Britain had a defensive alliance with Poland.)

Quotes over 2nd World War

from the book "Truth for Germany - The Question of Guilt of the Second World War"

Winston Churchill in 1936:
"We will impose war on Hitler, whether he likes it or not."
(Source: Das Neue Reich Nr. 15, 11. 4. 1959 page. 4 H. Grimm)

In June 1939, Marshal Rydz-Smigly told Polish officers:
"Poland wants the war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it, even if it wanted to."
(Source: quoted in: Heinz Splittgerber: Unkenntnis oder Infamie? – Darstellung und Faktn zum Kriegsausbruch 1939. Recklinghausen 1996. p. 7)

In 1936, the newspaper of Marshal Rydz-Smigly, the Warsaw "Kurjer Porany", commented on this topic:
"It cannot be said that the Germans would succeed in stopping the progressive process of de-Germanization of the western parts of the country, but there is no doubt that they are about to put obstacles in the way of this process."
"The Poles could therefore be sure that they would continue to come closer to their goal of displacing or absorbing the German ethnic group. What they only had to fear from the German Volkstum work was a slowing down of the pace."

Through expropriation and land reform, Poland had appropriated three quarters of a million hectares of private German land by 1939. But neither England nor the League of Nations opposed this policy, neither before 1933 nor after. On the contrary, they supported them by their attitude even at the time when Poland's further territorial claims must have made clear the dangers to European peace in England as well!
Certainly, French and British politicians protested in Warsaw from time to time, but without force and without effect.

The "Manchester Guardian" reported from Poland on 14.12.1931:
"The minorities in Poland should disappear. It is Polish policy that ensures that they do not disappear only on paper. This policy is being driven forward ruthlessly and without the slightest attention paid to world public opinion, to international treaties or to the League of Nations. Ukraine has become hell under Polish rule. The same can be said of Belarus with even greater justification. The aim of Polish policy is the disappearance of national minorities, on paper and in reality."

Same British weekly a year earlier, on 17.10.1930:
"Polish terror in Ukraine today is worse than anything else in Europe. Ukraine has become a country of despair and destruction, which is all the more provocative because the rights of Ukrainians are guaranteed under international law, while the League of Nations is deaf to all appeals and statements and the rest of the world knows nothing about it or does not care about it."

U.S. General Robert E. Wood told a Senate committee that W. Churchill had told him in November 1936:
"Germany is becoming too strong, we have to destroy it."
(Quote: J. F. C. Fuller ,,Decisive Battles of the Western World" page 306 und
E. Hughes ,Winston Churchill - his career War and Peace" page 145 and ,,Hearings on Lerid and Lease" Febr. 1941 page 275)

A senior Polish general staff officer, H. Baginski, defined the main objectives of Polish foreign policy in a book award-winning by the Polish Commission for International Intellectual Cooperation, published in Warsaw in 1927: the annexation of Gdansk, East Prussia and most of Silesia.
"As long as there will be no peace in Europe until the Polish countries are completely returned to Poland, as long as the name Prussia, which is the name of a people who no longer exists, will not be erased from the map of Europe and as long as the Germans do not move their capital from Berlin further west, to the former capital Magdeburg on the Elbe or Merseburg an der Saale, as long as they do not return to the old name of the German Reich and as long as they do not stop dreaming of the correction of the borders in the East."
(Source: Chr. Höltje ,The Weimar Republic and the Ostlocarno Problem 1919-1934 - pp. 137 and 141.

The magazine, which is also censored by the state and close to Pilsudski
"Mocarstwowiec" - "The League of Great Powers" - wrote in 1930:

"We are aware that war between Poland and Germany cannot be avoided. We must prepare systematically and vigorously for this war. Today's generation will see that a new victory at Grunwald (allusion to the Battle of Tannenberg in 1410) will be inscribed in the pages of history. But we will beat this Grunwald in the suburbs of Berlin. Our ideal is to round off Poland with borders on the Oder in the west and the Neisse in Lusatia and to incorporate Prussia from the Pregel to the Spree. In this war, no prisoners will be taken, there will be no place for humanitarian feelings. We will surprise the whole world with our war against Germany."
(Quote: B. de Colonna ,Poland from the Inside" page 90 )

On 15.8.1939, the Polish ambassador in Paris, Lukasiewicz, told the French Foreign Minister Bonnet:
"It will be the Polish army that will invade Germany on the first day of the war."
(Source: M. Freund "Weltgeschichte der Gegenwart in Dokumente" Vol. III p. 90 and G. Bonnet "Before the Catastrophe" page 252)

On 26.8.1939 the AMBASSADOR of the USA in Moscow, E. Davies:
"One of the highest officials under Beck said to me, very firmly, that his government would never admit that Poland and Germany would come together to settle their difficulties over the Polish corridor and Gdansk. He expressed outrage at what he called the usual exaggeration of German military power. His government, he said, would show it to the world. Three weeks after the outbreak of war, Polish troops would be in Berlin. The "Westwall" or the Siegfried Line are nothing but a cotton thread. Poland does not need Russian help. They could deal with the Germans on their own."

below quotes from the book
"The Germany Protocol" by Ralf Uwe Hill

which you will most likely find on the Internet as a free PDF file.
"We made Hitler a monster, a devil. That's why we couldn't move away from it after the war. After all, we had mobilized the masses against the devil personally. So after the war we were forced to play in this devil scenario. We could not possibly have made it clear to our people that the war was only an economic preventive measure."

(Quote: US Secretary of State James Baker III in der Spiegel, ed. 13 of 1992)

"Germany's unforgivable crime before World War II was an attempt to extract its economic power from the world trading system and to create its own exchange system in which world finance could no longer earn money."
(Quote: Winston Chruchill in his memoirs (The Silesian 05.06.1992)

"The statesmen will invent cheap lies and blame the nation being attacked, and everyone will be pleased with such conscience-appeasing falsifications, and he will eagerly learn them and refuse to examine any counter-arguments."
Mark Twain

"Above all, it is true that we English have always waged war against our competitors in trade and transport. And our main competitor in trade and transport today is not France, but Germany. In a war with Germany, we would be able to gain a lot and lose nothing..."
(Quote: The English weekly magazine "Saturday Review", on 24.08.1895)

"It was not Hitler's political teachings that plunged us into war.
The reason for this was the success of its growth in building a new economy. The roots of the war were envy, greed and fear."

(Quote: Historian and Major General J. F.C. Fuller in The Second World War, 1950)

"Now it is clear that the whole (Wehrmacht) exhibition must be warned. Why has no German historian uncovered the many mistakes and deceptions? History professors only give the answer when ours promises not to mention his name: Every historian has immediately seen how sloppy and suggestive the exhibition was set up, but who wants to be finished in public? The persecutors of dissenters have come a long way."
Editor-in-chief Helmut Markwort in his weekly
"FOCUS Diary" 43/1999

"We did not go to war in 1939 to save Germany from Hitler, the continent from fascism. As in 1914, we entered the war for the no less noble reason that we could not accept German domination in Europe."
"Frankfurter Allgemeine" of 18.09.1989

"The first victim of war is the truth."
Senator Hiram Johnson, 1917

"Now we have forced Hitler to go to war, so that he can no longer peacefully repeal one piece of the Treaty of Versailles after another."
(Quote: Lord Halifax, English Ambassador to Washington,
1939 and Member of the Committee of 300)

"I will crush Germany."

Frank Roosevelt, 1932 from: "Wider Willkür und Machtrausch", p. 241

"We will impose war on Hitler, whether he likes it or not."
Winston Churchill in 1936, when he saw the economic successes after Hitler broke away from the bondage of the international banks and introduced the labor currency, which made the German Reich self-sufficient and brought unprecedented economic prosperity to the Reich.

"Poland must insist that it cannot exist without Königsberg, without all of East Prussia. We must now demand in Locarno that the whole of East Prussia be liquidated. It can be given autonomy under Polish sovereignty. Then it will not be a corridor (via the free city of Gdansk - editor's note) To give. If this is not done peacefully, then there will be a Second Tannenberg."
The Polish newspaper "Gazeta Gdanska", on 09.10.1925

"Poland wants to avoid war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it, even if it wanted to..."
(Quote: Marshall and Inspector General Rydz-Smnigly, in a public lecture to the Polish military in 1939.)

"Before the Nuremberg Tribunal, I condemned - together with my Russian colleagues - Nazi aggression and terror. Today I believe that Hitler and the German people did not want war, but that we - Great Britain - declared war on Germany with the intention of destroying it in accordance with our doctrine of the balance of forces. And we were encouraged by those Americans who surrounded Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler's appeals not to start war.
Today we have to admit that Hitler was right. He offered us cooperation with Germany. Instead, since 1945 we have been confronted with the enormous power of the Soviet Empire. I feel shame and humiliation when I see that the goals for which we accused Hitler are relentlessly pursued today - only under a different name."

(Quote: Sir Hartle Shawcross, Chief Prosecutor of the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal in his speech at Stourbridge on 16 March 1984)

"The point here is that Hitler, unlike Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin, did not want a general outbreak of war in 1939."
(Quote: „Blasting of the historical Blackout", 1962)

"As Christians, we must ask ourselves before God and man:
What was the real cause that led us to war through Roosevelt? One thing is already clear: it was not an ideological war to destroy National Socialism, since we were allied with the even more dangerous Bolshevism. The only true answer must be:
The old cardinal sins of humanity — selfishness, greed, and greed — led our nation to war. Under the Roosevelt administration, we did not want to allow the course of history to be reversed, for us to become the have-nots and other nations to become the haves. We wanted to continue to live in abundance and leave the others in the shortage forever, we wanted to continue to be the rich and keep the others in their poverty, we wanted to enjoy undisturbed what we had gathered together in earthly goods through conquest, extermination and slavery. We wished to continue to live on the sunny side of existence and to know the others in the shade, to always be up and to keep the others on the ground. We wanted to stay on our American way of life with the highest standard of living while the others were starving. Above all, we wanted to get rid of our biggest and most successful rival in the global market."
"America's Responsibility for the Crime against the German People" by the German-born Reverend Ludwig A. Fritsch from 1947. On the basis of this writing, US President Truman allowed him to send "love gift packages" to Germany in order to spare the starving millions an agonizing death. Until then, foreign aid to the German people had been banned by the United States.
"Roosevelt knew exactly what he meant when he called for unconditional surrender. According to its barbaric interpretation, this concept included the right to dispose of everything, people and material, property and intellectual goods. The patents and manufacturing secrets that our troops stole and brought here alone outweigh the billions we spent on warfare. Even theabduction and forcible accommodation of German scientists and experts to East and West is taken for granted.
In the face of God, I ask our nation, I ask you, you servants
of the Gospel: Have the Germans ever done us in all our history such injustices as we inflicted on them in the two world wars and still do? What did the Germans do to us Americans to punish them twice in a generation in the cruelest and most inhumane way that history has never known? Is this American gratitude for all the hard work and loyalty with which German people built our country here and won our victories?"

(Quote: "America's Responsibility for the Crime against the German People" by the German-born Reverend Ludwig A. Fritsch from 1947.
"What we in the German resistance did not really want to understand during the war, we learned afterwards completely: that the war was not fought against Hitler, but against Germany.")

Eugen Gerstenmaier, from 1954 President of the Bundestag in the "Resistance"
"With atrocity propaganda we won the war (...) and now we're really getting started. We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will increase it until no one will accept a good word from the Germans, what they have had in other countries and they themselves will be so confused that they no longer know what they are doing.
When this is achieved, when they begin to stain their own nest and do so not gnashing their teeth, but in a hurry to please the victors, then only then is the victory complete.
It is never definitive. Re-education requires careful, incessant care like English lawns. Only a moment of negligence and the weeds break through - that inexorable weed of historical truth."

(Quote: The former British chief propagandist Sefton Delmer to the German international law expert Prof. Grimm after the military capitulation in 1945)

"For the purposes of the Nuremberg Trials, it was sufficient to insinuate that the war, with all its consequences, was due to Hitler's aggression. But this explanation is too simple. Nor does it correspond to the facts, because Hitler wanted anything but a world war."
(Quote: The British military writer and historian Hart on 03.09.1949 in the London "Picture Post")

"The German sense of war guilt represents a case of almost incomprehensible self-incrimination without equal in the history of mankind. In any case, I know of no other example in history of a people showing this almost insane addiction to take on the dark shadows of guilt for a political crime that it did not commit, except that crime of blaming itself for World War II..."
(Quote: The US historian and philosopher of history Barnes 1951)

"It is still to be claimed that the final article of the old Basic Law, Article 146, which made it mandatory to submit a new constitution to the German people in the event of German unification, has not been complied with. I am sure that we will all experience enormous damage that can hardly be compensated for if we continue to live with this breach of the Constitution. The fathers and mothers of the Basic Law of the old Federal Republic understood the Constitution of the Federal Republic as a provisional measure with regard to a perhaps later possible unity. Accordingly, the preamble was formulated and accordingly the final article. We have to stick to that."
(Quote: Günter Grass in his book "Questions on German Unity")

"One may say today about what one wants: Germany was a flourishing, happy country in 1936. On his face lay the radiance of a woman in love. And the Germans were in love - in love with Hitler ... And they had every reason to be grateful: Hitler had conquered unemployment and brought them a new economic prosperity.
He had given the Germans a new awareness of their national strength and their national task."

(Quote: British chief propagandist Sefton Delmer in:
"Die Deutschen und ich".)

"I have just returned from a visit to Germany. I have now seen Germany's famous leader, including the great changes he has caused. Whatever one thinks of his methods - and these are certainly not those of a parliamentary country - there can be no doubt that he has brought about a wonderful change in the minds of the people, in their behaviour among themselves, in their social and economic self-presentation. It is not the Germany of the first decade after the World War that lived broken, depressed, depressed, with a sense of inability and fearfulness. It is now full of hope and trust and a renewed sense of determination to direct one's own life without the influence of any forces beyond one's borders. For the first time in Germany after the World War, a sense of security has generally moved in among the people. It is a happy Germany. I've seen and gotten to know it everywhere."
(Quote: Lloyd Georges in the "Daily Express" of 17.09.1936
after his visit to Berchtesgaden with Adolf Hitler)

"I asked Joe Kennedy (U.S. Ambassador to London) about his conversations with Roosevelt and N. Chamberlain in 1938. He said Chamberlain's conviction in 1939 was that Britain had nothing in hand to fight and that it could not dare to go to war against Hitler. Neither the French nor the English would have made Poland the reason for war if they had not been incessantly incited by Washington. America and world Jewry would have driven England into war."
(Quote: U.S. Secretary of Defense J. Forrestal on 27.12.1945 in his
Book „The Forrestal Diaries", New York, page 121 and follow)

"We Germans should learn to endure the truth even if it is favorable to us"
(Quote: Henry of Brentano)

"President Roosevelt and Jews around the world put pressure on me to refrain from any understanding with Hitler."
(Quote: Neville Chamberlain am 15. Januar 1952 im „New Chronicle")

"The Poles have lost their last sense of measure and size. Any foreigner who looks at the new maps in Poland, whereupon a large part of Germany has already been annexed in the extremely rich imagination of the Poles as far as Berlin, further Bohemia, Moravia, Slovakia and a huge part of Russia, must think that Poland has become a huge insane asylum."
(Quote: The Flemish writer Ward on 03.08.1939;
cf. "Nie wieder München", page 207)

And now two more quotes from the book "Truth for Germany" by Udo Walendy

Winston Churchill im November 1935:
"While all these terrible changes were taking place in Europe, Private Hitler was fighting his long, tiring battle for the German heart. The story of this struggle cannot be read without admiration for the courage, sincerity and strength of the personality that enabled him to challenge, defy, overwhelm or reconcile - at least to assert himself against all the authorities who blocked his path. He and the ever-growing multitudes of those who joined him showed in their patriotic fire and love of the fatherland that there was nothing they would not be willing to do or dare, no sacrifice of life, health, freedom that they would not bring themselves or impose on their opponents."

( Source: W. Churchill "The truth about Hitler" in Strand Magazine November 1935 quoted at: Sündermann "Alter Feind was nun?"
Page 70 )

Hitler's success, in Churchill's view, was the responsibility of the Allies, Britain and France, "and the execution of how the tables were turned against the smug, incompetent and semi-blind victors deserves to be regarded as a miracle in the history of the world and as a miracle associated with personal effort and life commitment. of a single man is inextricably linked. Those who met Hitler face to face in public, on business or on social occasions met a very competent, cool, well-informed functionary with a pleasant nature, a noticeable smile and few remained untouched by his fine personal magnetism.
This impression is by no means due to the shine, the dazzling of power. He worked in this way on his co-workers at every stage of his struggle, even when his happiness had sunk to the deepest depths. One may disapprove of Hitler's system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. Should our country ever be defeated, I would hope to find such an admirable struggle that will restore our courage and lead us back to our place among nations."

( Source: E. Hughes "Winston Churchill - his career in War and Peace" page 144 and L. P. Lohner "The Powerful and the Tyrant" page 214 )